All of this info is relevant to RPG Maker VX Ace. This is a little complicated and will probably not work in an ask so I hope they do not mind me posting this publicly. Similar to the restrictions of the GPL.Įdit: Anyone with corrections, please comment.Juichibey was asking about the scripts I use for character animation and how they work. Same stipulations as CC BY, but any usage, redistribution, or modification must be under the same or a compatible license. The most restrictive of the CC licenses allowed on OGA.Essentially the same as CC BY, but removes a restriction on using works within DRM projects.Author can require additional stipulations such as requiring user to link back to OGA. Author retains rights to work & must be credited/attributed. Works can be used, modifed, & redistributed for essentially any purpose.You can use, modify, & redistribute it for essentially any purpose, even without giving credit to the author. Author has revoked all rights to the work.Note: You can also get to these summaries by clicking the icons for each license under the 'License(s)' section of the submission. Here is a quick breakdown of the CC/OGA licenses (I am not a professional on the subject & suggest you read the summary in the links for each): I think in practice, most people assume that CC BY-SA doesn't apply to the game - or if it does, many Open Source uses are also in violation, and CC BY-SA is next to useless as a licence (at least, as far as game development is All works on can be used commercially as long as you abide by the restrictions of the license. I know what the OGA FAQ says - but I disagree with it I can't see any justification in the licence for those claims (either that source must be released, or that the GPL counts as a similar licence - it doesn't, as there are currently no 'similar' licences). Which would mean GPL games using it would be in violation just as much as a closed source one.

If CC BY-SA did apply to the game to, then the only way to use CC BY-SA art would be to also release the game as CC BY-SA. So the 'similar' bit is irrelevant at the moment, and certainly doesn't include options like the GPL. However, that page says 'Please note that to date, Creative Commons has not approved any licenses for compatibility'! It's also worth noting that 'same or similar license' is defined as being either CC BY-SA 3.0 or later, or a 'Creative Commons Compatible License', defined at. Even if 'include a graphic in a game' was a case of 'build upon this work', there's still no requirement to release the source - there's nothing in CC BY-SA that says one must release source code, or anything about source code at all.

Fantasy sprite sheets rpg maker mv